Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Not a Bundle of Fun: the President's Direction on Court Bundles

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Slug : not-a-bundle-of-fun-the-president-s-direction-on-court-bundles
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 26, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89185

Julien Foster, Barrister, Goldsmith Chambers. A new President's Direction (PD) in relation to court bundles came into force on 2 October 2006. It replaces the existing President's Practice Direction dated 25 March 2000.The purpose of the article is to set out the main provisions of the PD and how it differs from the previous Practice Direction. However, the article is no substitute for reading the detailed provisions of the PD itself.

The PD is over twice as long as the previous Practice Direction. It is far more detailed in its provision. While it has the advantage of clarifying certain ambiguities that existed in the previous Practice Direction and may well improve the quality of case presentation in court, it places a further significant administrative burden on solicitors and also on the Bar. Without wishing to make practitioners unduly anxious, the author has no doubt that an example will very swiftly be made of a practitioner's non-compliance with the PD in the form of a well-publicised dressing down by a High Court judge. Exactly this happened days after the last Practice Direction came into force, when Wall J (as he then was) launched into and made wasted costs orders against some poor unfortunate who had failed to provide preliminary documents.

The article is divided into sections as follows: differences between the old Practice Direction and the PD; additional brand-new provisions in the PD; frequently asked questions; and recommendations to practitioners. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from