Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
What happens when assets are tainted: financial remedies v confiscation proceedings revisited
Sarah Wood, 5SAHFollowing on from her 2019 article 'Financial Remedies v Confiscation Proceedings: What Takes Priority?’ ([2019] Fam Law 941) in which Sarah Wood looked, in general terms, about...
Disclosure 2: This time it’s practical
Andrew Shaw, New Court ChambersSam Prout, New Court ChambersThis article aims to provide a practical guide to navigating some disclosure issues that can arise in family proceedings concerning...
Placing looked after children outside of the jurisdiction (post-Brexit)
Michael Jones, Deans Court ChambersA summary of the legal provisions that apply to placing looked after children outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales. This article contains a brief summary of...
Rings, Rolexes and Renoirs – The treatment of gifts, engagement rings, and heirlooms when a relationship comes to an end
Sarah Dodds, Senior Associate, Kingsley NapleyLiam Hurren, Trainee Solicitor, Kingsley NapleyWhen a couple separates, thoughts often turn to the valuable or sentimental items which they acquired or...
HM Treasury responds to consultation on increasing normal minimum pension age
HM Treasury  has responded to its consultation on the proposed protections framework and implementing an increase of the normal minimum pension age (NMPA) from 55 to 57 in 2028, which will...
View all articles
Authors

Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120

Sep 29, 2018, 19:46 PM
Permission to appeal was refused.
Slug : norman-v-norman-2017-ewca-civ-120
Meta Title : Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 3, 2017, 06:41 AM
Article ID : 113910
(Court of Appeal, Gloster, Lewison and King LJJ, 3 March 2017)

Permission to appeal was refused.


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 120

Case No: B6/2015/2451

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM GUILDFORD COUNTY COURT
HHJ Raeside
MK03D00837

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 03/03/2017

Before:

LADY JUSTICE GLOSTER
Vice-President of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division

LORD JUSTICE LEWISON

and

LADY JUSTICE KING

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

Tina Norman (the wife)
Appellant

- and -

Robert Norman (the husband)
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jeffrey Littman (instructed by Public Access Counsel) for the Appellant
Michael Glaser and Phillip Blatchly (instructed by Bishop & Sewell LLP) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 19 January 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved 

Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120.rtf
Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from