Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles
Authors

No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)

Nov 25, 2020, 16:17 PM
This article ends by suggesting that the only way forward is for all marriages in England and Wales to be conducted by way of a civil ceremony in a register office. Couples would then be free to follow this ceremony in a place of their choice and in accordance with their beliefs.
Slug :
Meta Title : No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 25, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of Buckingham

In July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the grounds that marriage law in England and Wales was discriminatory because it did not give legal recognition to any marriage conducted by a humanist celebrant. Their application was declined. Mrs Justice Eady's judgment was interesting, intricate and lengthy. The judge gave a detailed account of: humanist beliefs, the outdated law of marriage, and Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 (the Convention) relating to discrimination.

The reason for the rejection of the couple's application was because the Secretary of State for Justice maintained that he was justified in not addressing the issue of humanist marriage until after the outcome of the Law Commission's current work on the reform of wedding law. 

The judgment appears to confuse the work of the Law Commission which is about weddings and not about the expansion of the categories of those who can marry in accordance with their beliefs. Whatever recommendations the Law Commission makes with respect to wedding law, humanists will remain outside of the current categories of those who may marry in accordance with their religious beliefs.

The article ends by suggesting that the only way forward is for all marriages in England and Wales to be conducted by way of a civil ceremony in a register office. Couples would then be free to follow this ceremony in a place of their choice and in accordance with their beliefs. 

 


The full article will be published in the December issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from