Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

No fault divorce: where next?

Sep 29, 2018, 22:45 PM
divorce, fault-based divorce, no fault divorce, blame, No Fault Divorce Bill, Richard Bacon MP, separation, marriage breakdown
On 13 October a 10-minute motion was debated in the House of Commons at the instigation of Conservative MP Richard Bacon. The motion was, 'That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for the dissolution of a marriage or civil partnership when each party has separately made a declaration that the marriage or civil partnership has irretrievably broken down without a requirement by either party to satisfy the court of any other facts; and for connected purposes'. The motion passed and there will be a second reading of the No Fault Divorce Bill on 4 December 2015.
Slug : no-fault-divorce-where-next
Meta Title : No fault divorce: where next?
Meta Keywords : divorce, fault-based divorce, no fault divorce, blame, No Fault Divorce Bill, Richard Bacon MP, separation, marriage breakdown
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 19, 2015, 03:10 AM
Article ID : 110653
On 13 October a 10-minute motion was debated in the House of Commons at the instigation of Conservative MP Richard Bacon. The motion was, 'That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for the dissolution of a marriage or civil partnership when each party has separately made a declaration that the marriage or civil partnership has irretrievably broken down without a requirement by either party to satisfy the court of any other facts; and for connected purposes'. The motion passed and there will be a second reading of the No Fault Divorce Bill on 4 December 2015.

The No Fault Divorce Bill has not yet been published but Richard Bacon explained in his speech that it would operate by adding a sixth 'fact' by which irretrievable breakdown could be proved, being both parties declaring irretrievable breakdown, and a 1-year cooling off period before decree absolute is made. Under these proposals, no fault divorce would only be available where divorce was agreed on, but should immediate no-fault divorce also be available on a unilateral basis? Resolution’s  Manifesto for Family Law, published earlier this year, seeks abolition of all fault-based divorce, and outlined a possible procedure requiring a 6-month consideration period after one or both parties give notice of irretrievable breakdown, after which the divorce could be finalised if one or both parties seek that.

Part 2 of the Family Law Act 1996 would also have abolished all fault grounds; it required attendance at 'information meetings' at which information would be given about divorce and about marriage counselling, and a 9-month 'period for reflection and consideration'. The scheme provided for by the legislation was trialled in pilot areas, but was abandoned in 2001, when it was concluded that it was ineffective in saving marriages, as the information meetings came too late in the marital breakdown process. Those who now advocate no fault divorce tend not to see its purpose as saving marriages; by the time a couple look into the divorce process it is often too late for that, but it may, perhaps, be early enough to advance a constructive and co-operative post-separation relationship by encouraging the parties to look to the future, rather than the past.

While Richard Bacon's Bill would be an important step forward, many will feel that by retaining the option of fault-based divorce it would not go far enough. In particular, if that fact were to have a 1-year cooling off period while the behaviour and adultery facts did not, the risk would surely remain that some would choose a fault-based fact to speed up the process. There would also be a risk that agreeing to divorce on a no fault basis could become a bargaining chip, a concern that would not arise under Resolution's proposals. It could also be argued that retaining fault grounds would fail to send a strong message that the focus of divorce should not be on blame and recrimination but on moving forward on a constructive basis and looking to the future.

The full version of this item will appear in the December 2015 issue of  Family Law.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
divorce2
Provider : Hunters
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from