Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT/INJUNCTIONS: Nicholls v Nicholls [2008] EWCA Civ 121

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : nicholls-v-nicholls-2008-ewca-civ-121
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 30, 2008, 04:09 AM
Article ID : 88851

(Court of Appeal; Wilson LJ and Black J; 30 January 2008)

Following the parents separation the mother, who was an alcoholic, caused problems for the father and the four children. The court made a non-molestation order, forbidding the mother from going within 100 metres of the former matrimonial home and from intimidating, harassing or pestering the father or any of the children. The mother immediately breached the order, and was sentenced to 3 weeks' immediate imprisonment. On release from prison the mother breached the injunction again, and was given a 28-day custodial sentence, suspended. Less than 2 weeks later the mother breached the injunction a further three times over the course of a week. Having returned to court for sentencing under the influence of alcohol, and with an unhelpful report from her probation officer, she was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. She appealed on the basis that the sentence was excessive.

The judge had had little option but to impose a custodial sentence; he had had to bear in mind that there had been repeated breaches and earlier custodial terms, both actual and suspended, and that the root cause, the mother's alcohol addiction, had not been addressed. The mother's progress in prison could form part of an application to the trial judge to purge the contempt.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from