Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT/INJUNCTIONS: Nicholls v Nicholls [2008] EWCA Civ 121

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : nicholls-v-nicholls-2008-ewca-civ-121
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 30, 2008, 04:09 AM
Article ID : 88851

(Court of Appeal; Wilson LJ and Black J; 30 January 2008)

Following the parents separation the mother, who was an alcoholic, caused problems for the father and the four children. The court made a non-molestation order, forbidding the mother from going within 100 metres of the former matrimonial home and from intimidating, harassing or pestering the father or any of the children. The mother immediately breached the order, and was sentenced to 3 weeks' immediate imprisonment. On release from prison the mother breached the injunction again, and was given a 28-day custodial sentence, suspended. Less than 2 weeks later the mother breached the injunction a further three times over the course of a week. Having returned to court for sentencing under the influence of alcohol, and with an unhelpful report from her probation officer, she was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. She appealed on the basis that the sentence was excessive.

The judge had had little option but to impose a custodial sentence; he had had to bear in mind that there had been repeated breaches and earlier custodial terms, both actual and suspended, and that the root cause, the mother's alcohol addiction, had not been addressed. The mother's progress in prison could form part of an application to the trial judge to purge the contempt.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from