The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
CONTEMPT/INJUNCTIONS: Nicholls v Nicholls  EWCA Civ 121
Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jan 30, 2008, 04:09 AM
Article ID :88851
(Court of Appeal; Wilson LJ and Black J; 30 January 2008)
Following the parents separation the mother, who was an alcoholic, caused problems for the father and the four children. The court made a non-molestation order, forbidding the mother from going within 100 metres of the former matrimonial home and from intimidating, harassing or pestering the father or any of the children. The mother immediately breached the order, and was sentenced to 3 weeks' immediate imprisonment. On release from prison the mother breached the injunction again, and was given a 28-day custodial sentence, suspended. Less than 2 weeks later the mother breached the injunction a further three times over the course of a week. Having returned to court for sentencing under the influence of alcohol, and with an unhelpful report from her probation officer, she was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. She appealed on the basis that the sentence was excessive.
The judge had had little option but to impose a custodial sentence; he had had to bear in mind that there had been repeated breaches and earlier custodial terms, both actual and suspended, and that the root cause, the mother's alcohol addiction, had not been addressed. The mother's progress in prison could form part of an application to the trial judge to purge the contempt.