Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles
Authors

CONTEMPT/INJUNCTIONS: Nicholls v Nicholls [2008] EWCA Civ 121

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Slug : nicholls-v-nicholls-2008-ewca-civ-121
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 30, 2008, 04:09 AM
Article ID : 88851

(Court of Appeal; Wilson LJ and Black J; 30 January 2008)

Following the parents separation the mother, who was an alcoholic, caused problems for the father and the four children. The court made a non-molestation order, forbidding the mother from going within 100 metres of the former matrimonial home and from intimidating, harassing or pestering the father or any of the children. The mother immediately breached the order, and was sentenced to 3 weeks' immediate imprisonment. On release from prison the mother breached the injunction again, and was given a 28-day custodial sentence, suspended. Less than 2 weeks later the mother breached the injunction a further three times over the course of a week. Having returned to court for sentencing under the influence of alcohol, and with an unhelpful report from her probation officer, she was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. She appealed on the basis that the sentence was excessive.

The judge had had little option but to impose a custodial sentence; he had had to bear in mind that there had been repeated breaches and earlier custodial terms, both actual and suspended, and that the root cause, the mother's alcohol addiction, had not been addressed. The mother's progress in prison could form part of an application to the trial judge to purge the contempt.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from