Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

BANKRUPTCY: Nicholls v Lan [2006] EWHC 1255 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 16:28 PM
Slug : nicholls-v-lan-2006-ewhc-1255-ch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 26, 2006, 04:43 AM
Article ID : 85205

(Mr Paul Morgan QC sitting as a deputy High Court judge; Chancery Division; 26 May 2006) (2006) The Times August 4

Although the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (the 1996 Act) provided that the interests of creditors were to be taken into account in selling the family home, in an exceptional case, like the instant, the 1996 Act did not prescribe the weight to be attached to those interests. The difficulty was that the court had to balance the interests of the creditors against the needs of the bankrupt's spouse, which were considerations of a different character and quality. Since it was almost axiomatic that what the creditors wanted was to be paid their money as soon as possible, it was not necessary for a trustee to produce very much by way of positive evidence as to their interests. The interests of creditors were not to be dismissed as having no weight in a case where there was little or no specific evidence as to their identities and as to their concerns. The order for sale of the property had not involved a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from