Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

NEGLIGENCE/ PERSONAL INJURY: XA v YA [2010] EWHC 1983 (QB)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : negligence-personal-injury-xa-v-ya-2010-ewhc-1983-qb
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 5, 2010, 09:00 AM
Article ID : 91271

(Queen's Bench Division; Thirlwall J; 30 July 2010)

An application by an adult son for damages from his mother in respect of assaults by both parents. The siblings had successfully obtained damages against the father. The claim was dismissed as it was outside the limitation period. The issue was whether the mother owed the son a duty of care at common law.

On the son’s own analysis, the mother’s duty of care could have been discharged only by breaking up the family. Such a duty was novel and should be treated with caution. Given the difficulties family courts had in making decisions as to the care of children, it was undesirable for ordinary civil courts to have to judge retrospectively decisions of a mother about how best to ensure a secure upbringing for her children in context of a claim for damages for negligence.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from