Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

‘Murphy’s law’: are term orders appropriate? (£)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:35 PM
Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam), family law, adult periodical payments orders, safeguarding financial position
The recent High Court decision in Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam), [2014] Fam Law 1520 provides an important restatement of the statutory framework and case-law concerning the term of adult periodical payments orders.
Slug : murphy-s-law-are-term-orders-appropriate
Meta Title : ‘Murphy’s law’: are term orders appropriate?
Meta Keywords : Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam), family law, adult periodical payments orders, safeguarding financial position
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 7, 2015, 11:10 AM
Article ID : 108171

The recent High Court decision in Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam), [2014] Fam Law 1520 provides an important restatement of the statutory framework and case-law concerning the term of adult periodical payments orders. This decision stresses the importance of safeguarding the financial position of the weaker party. The lower courts in the last several years have drawn back from making joint lives periodical payments orders. Terms are often made on the basis of arbitrary assessment of a wife/mother’s future earning capacity. Husbands have sought to argue that this development in the law is appropriate and that the days of joint lives orders should now end (or be orders made sparingly). Baroness Deech presented a Private Member’s Bill to the House of Lords in 2014 which stresses the desirability of term maintenance orders and a clean break – a Bill which sought to radically change the law. In an important restatement of the law relating to the term of adult periodical payments orders, Holman J in Murphy firmly sets out the principles that should apply, stating that, ‘the law currently is not the law as it would be if Baroness Deech’s Bill is ever enacted. It is, of course, the current law which I must apply.’

The full version of this article appears in the January 2015 issue of Family Law.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or for any offers, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 918 1555, or email:sales.manager@jordanpublishing.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Family_Law
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from