Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

More Skype hearings prompted by the Coronavirus outbreak

Mar 17, 2020, 10:51 AM
Slug :
Meta Title : More Skype hearings prompted by the Coronavirus outbreak
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Mar 17, 2020, 10:51 AM
Article ID :

Reports in some media and newspapers on Sunday 8 March 2020 indicate that HM Courts & Tribunals Service is moving ahead with coronavirus containment plans to have more Skype type video-conferencing court hearings, particularly and initially in criminal cases, to reduce the need for use of public transport and public gathering. The family law profession will follow developments closely as it can only be a short step to the same measures in the Family Court.

The use of Skype type video-conferencing hearings in the Family Court has had slow and not particularly efficient progress over the years. Some High Court judges were sceptical. Admittedly the initial technology was pretty hopeless. There was also some reticence borne out of the security of commercially available video-conferencing suites given the confidentiality of proceedings. Even now there are huge frustrations with the existing software and there is a way to go.

Nevertheless, many of us have been calling for video facilities to be used far more frequently in the family courts. It makes little sense to have lawyers and parties travelling huge distances for what may at times be a fairly short and relatively uncontentious hearing. We all live our lives and our relationships through video-conferencing communication, whether it be Skype, FaceTime or other facilities. Why must it stop at the door to the family court? 

Tragic as the cause may be, the necessary preventive procedures which our country and other countries must put in place must cause us to review our overall working methods. If this thereby gives a boost to far greater use of video and other remote hearings and exploring the best technology and better ways of working, then whether for client meetings, conferences with counsel or other face to face scenarios, this will be very beneficial for the family justice system.

Family justice professionals will be following announcements over the next few days as it relates to court hearings.  All prudent law firms and chambers will be renewing their preparation and plans for either a moderate outbreak or the worst-case scenario and everything in between.  This will inevitably include review of resources and technology to ensure we can all continue to provide the best ongoing service for our clients, the courts and all others with whom we work in family justice.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
  • coronavirus
  • courts
  • facetime in courts
  • skype in courts
  • video links in courts
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from