Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles

MoJ publises response to consultation on family legal aid payment schemes

Sep 29, 2018, 19:00 PM
The MoJ has published a response to Single Family Court fee consultation which highlights how the government intends to proceed.
Slug : moj-publises-response-to-consultation-on-family-legal-aid-payment-schemes
Meta Title : MoJ publises response to consultation on family legal aid payment schemes
Meta Keywords : family law, fees, legal aid
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2014, 09:25 AM
Article ID : 104637

MoJIn October 2013, the Ministry of Justice launched a consultation into the Government's proposals for changes to the family legal aid remuneration schemes. The changes were intended to be incorporated into secondary legislation to come into effect when the new Single Family Court (FC) is introduced later this year.

The new FC will become the national court for most family proceedings in England and Wales and County Courts and Magistrates Courts will cease to hear family proceedings. The High Court will still be able to hear family proceedings, but will primarily deal with those matters that are reserved for the High Court, including those that concern its inherent jurisdiction. Changes to the family legal aid remuneration framework are therefore necessary to ensure that the legal aid scheme reflects the new court system.

It was proposed that family legal aid fee levels should be linked to the level of the judge allocated to the case rather than the tier of the court, as there will only be two tiers of court but four levels of judges (lay bench, district judge, circuit judge and High Court judge). This change would also apply to proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, where they are heard in the family court.

The consultation has now concluded and the MoJ has published a response to the consultation which highlights how the government intends to proceed. There were 12 responses, mainly from representative bodies or providers of family legal aid services. It was intended, as far as possible, to be cost-neutral and therefore have no impact on legal aid recipients or those providing family legal aid services. In its response, the MoJ has confirmed that it is not anticipated that the proposed change will affect the level of remuneration to legal professionals providing family legal aid services.

The Government also sought views on potential changes to Practice Direction 27A in relation to the current system of bolt on fees for court bundles, payable under the Family Advocacy Scheme and limiting the size of court bundles to a maximum of 350 pages. The Government has not reached a conclusion as to the changes it wishes to introduce at this stage, but aired concern in the response that linking the bolt-on fee to the amount of material involved in preparing the case would create a high risk that legal aid providers and advocates would routinely claim higher bolt-on fees than they do currently. It therefore stated that this was not a viable way forward but it would introduce alternative proposals for consultation for changes to the system of bolt on fees in respect of court bundles shortly.     

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from