Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Moher v Moher [2019] EWCA Civ 1482

Sep 13, 2019, 08:28 AM
Financial remedies – Disclosure of documents – Quantification of non-disclosed resources.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the husband’s appeal against the financial remedies order; the judge had not been required to provide a figure or bracket in every case when confronted by non-disclosure.
Slug :
Meta Title : Moher v Moher [2019] EWCA Civ 1482
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Disclosure of documents – Quantification of non-disclosed resources.
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 12, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Court of Appeal, King, Moylan and Rose LJJ, 21 August 2019)

Financial remedies – Disclosure of documents – Quantification of non-disclosed resources.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the husband’s appeal against the financial remedies order; the judge had not been required to provide a figure or bracket in every case when confronted by non-disclosure.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWCA Civ 1482

Case No: B6/2018/2975

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT
FAMILY DIVISION
HIS HONOUR JUDGE WALLWORK
Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge

LV16D01674

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 21/08/2019

Before:

LADY JUSTICE KING
LORD JUSTICE MOYLAN and

LADY JUSTICE ROSE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

MOHER
Appellant

- and -

MOHER
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Brent Molyneux QC and Juliet Allen (instructed by Judge Law Solicitors) for the Appellant
Sally Harrison QC (instructed by Bps Family Law Llp) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 9th May 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

 

Judgment: Moher v Moher [2019] EWCA Civ 1482

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from