Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Miscarriage of Justice

Sep 29, 2018, 16:32 PM
Slug : miscarriage-of-justice
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 10, 2007, 09:15 AM
Article ID : 85345

In Hammerton v Hammerton [2007] EWCA Civ 248 on 23 March 2007, the Court of Appeal stated that the appellant father had been wrongly imprisoned for contempt of court because of a 'sorry story of administrative and judicial errors'. Mr Hammerton, who was unrepresented, had applied for contact while his former wife had applied for his committal for breach of previous contact orders. Judge Collins, sitting at Central London Civil Justice Centre, heard both cases together and gave Mr Hammerton a three-month sentence, of which he served half.

Lord Justice Wall and Lord Justice Moses said, amongst other matters, that no-one should be sent to prison without the benefit of legal advice and representation at public expense. They were also sufficiently concerned about the conduct of the whole case to have decided to send copies of their judgments to the President of the Family Division and to the Family Division Liaison Judge for Greater London: 'The former might like to consider whether it raises any issues which could properly be discussed by the Family Justice Council: the latter may well wish to investigate further and to consider what steps are necessary to prevent a recurrence of each and every one of the regrettable events which have characterised this appeal.'

A week later on 30 March 2007 Mr Hammerton was imprisoned once more for contempt for throwing three eggs at Mr Justice Collins a few days after the Court of Appeal judgment. One struck the judge and Mr Hammerton then began to read out from the Court of Appeal decision. Sentencing him to two months imprisonment Mr Justice Ryder said that in any other circumstances Mr Hammerton would have been jailed for three. For further details of Hammerton v Hammerton see Cases below.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from