Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
View all articles
Authors

Miscarriage of Justice

Sep 29, 2018, 16:32 PM
Slug : miscarriage-of-justice
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 10, 2007, 09:15 AM
Article ID : 85345

In Hammerton v Hammerton [2007] EWCA Civ 248 on 23 March 2007, the Court of Appeal stated that the appellant father had been wrongly imprisoned for contempt of court because of a 'sorry story of administrative and judicial errors'. Mr Hammerton, who was unrepresented, had applied for contact while his former wife had applied for his committal for breach of previous contact orders. Judge Collins, sitting at Central London Civil Justice Centre, heard both cases together and gave Mr Hammerton a three-month sentence, of which he served half.

Lord Justice Wall and Lord Justice Moses said, amongst other matters, that no-one should be sent to prison without the benefit of legal advice and representation at public expense. They were also sufficiently concerned about the conduct of the whole case to have decided to send copies of their judgments to the President of the Family Division and to the Family Division Liaison Judge for Greater London: 'The former might like to consider whether it raises any issues which could properly be discussed by the Family Justice Council: the latter may well wish to investigate further and to consider what steps are necessary to prevent a recurrence of each and every one of the regrettable events which have characterised this appeal.'

A week later on 30 March 2007 Mr Hammerton was imprisoned once more for contempt for throwing three eggs at Mr Justice Collins a few days after the Court of Appeal judgment. One struck the judge and Mr Hammerton then began to read out from the Court of Appeal decision. Sentencing him to two months imprisonment Mr Justice Ryder said that in any other circumstances Mr Hammerton would have been jailed for three. For further details of Hammerton v Hammerton see Cases below.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from