The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
The article provides a summary of the facts, the arguments at first instance and the various elements of the judgments in the Court of Appeal.
Meta Title :Miller v Miller: Guidance or Confusion?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Oct 25, 2005, 04:23 AM
Article ID :88265
Roger Bird, former District Judge at the Bristol County Court. Any hope of clear guidelines from Miller v Miller other than those contained in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 and White v White  1 AC 596,  2 FLR 981 is misplaced. However, some clear lessons can be drawn from Miller, not all of them new but they are usefully highlighted in the judgments and the author summarises these. The issues that Roger Bird thinks will cause difficulties for practitioners in the future are considered. The article provides a summary of the facts, the arguments at first instance and the various elements of the judgments in the Court of Appeal.
See November  Fam Law 874 for the full article.