The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
The article provides a summary of the facts, the arguments at first instance and the various elements of the judgments in the Court of Appeal.
Meta Title :Miller v Miller: Guidance or Confusion?
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Oct 25, 2005, 04:23 AM
Article ID :88265
Roger Bird, former District Judge at the Bristol County Court. Any hope of clear guidelines from Miller v Miller other than those contained in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 and White v White  1 AC 596,  2 FLR 981 is misplaced. However, some clear lessons can be drawn from Miller, not all of them new but they are usefully highlighted in the judgments and the author summarises these. The issues that Roger Bird thinks will cause difficulties for practitioners in the future are considered. The article provides a summary of the facts, the arguments at first instance and the various elements of the judgments in the Court of Appeal.
See November  Fam Law 874 for the full article.