Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Miles Geffin: The Judiciary: Shifting the Constitutional Boundary and Usurping Parliament's Role?

Sep 29, 2018, 17:20 PM
Slug : miles-geffin-the-judiciary-shifting-the-constitutional-boundary-and-usurping-parliament-s-role
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 11, 2008, 08:47 AM
Article ID : 89275

Miles Geffin, Professional Support Lawyer, Mishcon de Reya

The extent to which, in any circumstances, the judiciary has a mandate to shift the constitutional boundary between Parliament and the courts on issues of public policy is a highly controversial question. Where is the line to be drawn between, on the one hand, legitimate judicial interpretation and, on the other, improper judicial legislation? This article considers whether the courts have any legitimate authority to create a principle of equal sharing of assets on divorce and then, reactively, to recognise and enforce the terms of pre-nuptial agreements.

For the full article, see June [2008] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from