Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Miles Geffin: The Judiciary: Shifting the Constitutional Boundary and Usurping Parliament's Role?

Sep 29, 2018, 17:20 PM
Title : Miles Geffin: The Judiciary: Shifting the Constitutional Boundary and Usurping Parliament's Role?
Slug : miles-geffin-the-judiciary-shifting-the-constitutional-boundary-and-usurping-parliament-s-role
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 11, 2008, 08:47 AM
Article ID : 89275

Miles Geffin, Professional Support Lawyer, Mishcon de Reya

The extent to which, in any circumstances, the judiciary has a mandate to shift the constitutional boundary between Parliament and the courts on issues of public policy is a highly controversial question. Where is the line to be drawn between, on the one hand, legitimate judicial interpretation and, on the other, improper judicial legislation? This article considers whether the courts have any legitimate authority to create a principle of equal sharing of assets on divorce and then, reactively, to recognise and enforce the terms of pre-nuptial agreements.

For the full article, see June [2008] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from