Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CARE/CONTACT: Merton London Borough Council v K; Re K (Care: Representation: Public Funding) [2005] EWHC 167 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : merton-london-borough-council-v-k-re-k-care-representation-public-funding-2005-ewhc-167-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 15, 2005, 10:55 AM
Article ID : 88441

(15 February 2005; Baron J; Family Division) [2005] 2 FLR 422

Public funds should not be used to enable parties to be represented unless they had a positive case to be  before the court. If parties were joined (at a late stage) in care cases, their lawyers had a positive duty to set out why they are actually required to be repn court and must inform the Legal Services Commission in writing of the precise reasons why scarce public funds should be made available for trial. It was suggested that the Legal Services Commission draw up a new procedure for public law cases to ensure that only parties with a legitimate need were represented throughout the hearing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from