Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Mental Capacity and Family Practitioners

Sep 29, 2018, 16:30 PM
Slug : mental-capacity-and-family-practitioners
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 1, 2007, 10:16 AM
Article ID : 85291

District Judge Gordon Ashton, Deputy Master of the Court of Protection, Visiting Professor in Law at Northumbria University. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 establishes a comprehensive statutory framework setting out how decisions should be made by, and on behalf of, those whose capacity to make their own decisions is in doubt. The implementation date has now been put back from April to October 2007 in view of the work still to be done. A Code of Practice and Court Rules have to be produced, administrative changes made in regard to the new Office of the Public Guardian and Court of Protection, and suitable judges nominated and trained. The Code of Practice will provide practical guidance to all involved in the process and must be followed by attorneys, deputies and care professionals. It will be updated as experience is gained and to reflect decisions of the Court of Protection.

The new Act is built around a series of key principles: the presumption of capacity; when someone can be said to lack capacity; and that decisions should be made by or in the best interests of that person and with due regard for their rights and freedom of action. The Act sets out the mechanics of the new jurisdiction and establishes a new statutory form of power of attorney, the lasting power of attorney, which will replace enduring powers of attorney and may relate to personal welfare decisions as well as financial management. Other areas covered include general powers of the Court of Protection, living wills and certain decisions which the Act does not permit to be made on behalf of persons who lack capacity. For a detailed commentary on the new Act and the modernised Court of Protection and a useful contemplation of how it might affect practitioners by way of some envisaged case studies see the full article in March [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from