Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

Feb 12, 2020, 09:47 AM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement
The Family Division held that an award of £325,000 should be made to meet the husband's needs for an income and a further £10,000 for a car replacement. However, there was no reason for the wife to pay the husband's unreasonably incurred costs.
Slug :
Meta Title : MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 12, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 December 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement

The Family Division held that an award of £325,000 should be made to meet the husband's needs for an income and a further £10,000 for a car replacement. However, there was no reason for the wife to pay the husband's unreasonably incurred costs.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE                                                                                                                               No. ZC17D00215
FAMILY DIVISION

[2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2A 2LL

Thursday, 19 December 2019

Before:

MR JUSTICE COHEN

(In Private)

BETWEEN:

MB
Applicant

- and -

EB (No.2)
Respondent

_________

MR P. MITCHELL (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Applicant Husband.
MR N. CUSWORTH QC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the Respondent Wife.

_________

JUDGMENT

Judgment: MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from