Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

Feb 12, 2020, 09:47 AM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement
The Family Division held that an award of £325,000 should be made to meet the husband's needs for an income and a further £10,000 for a car replacement. However, there was no reason for the wife to pay the husband's unreasonably incurred costs.
Slug :
Meta Title : MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 12, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 December 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Separation agreement

The Family Division held that an award of £325,000 should be made to meet the husband's needs for an income and a further £10,000 for a car replacement. However, there was no reason for the wife to pay the husband's unreasonably incurred costs.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE                                                                                                                               No. ZC17D00215
FAMILY DIVISION

[2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2A 2LL

Thursday, 19 December 2019

Before:

MR JUSTICE COHEN

(In Private)

BETWEEN:

MB
Applicant

- and -

EB (No.2)
Respondent

_________

MR P. MITCHELL (instructed by Vardags Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Applicant Husband.
MR N. CUSWORTH QC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) appeared on behalf of the Respondent Wife.

_________

JUDGMENT

Judgment: MB v EB [2019] EWHC 3676 (Fam)

 

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from