Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)

Jul 10, 2019, 09:21 AM
Financial remedies – Marriage – Deed of separation – Divorce – Preliminary issues
The Family Division made findings as to the date of the parties’ separation and found that there had been no marital acquest either during the period up to separation or subsequently.
Slug :
Meta Title : MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Marriage – Deed of separation – Divorce – Preliminary issues
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 9, 2019, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Cohen J, 25 June 2019)

Financial remedies – Marriage – Deed of separation – Divorce – Preliminary issues

The Family Division made findings as to the date of the parties’ separation and found that there had been no marital acquest either during the period up to separation or subsequently.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)

Case No: ZC17D00215

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 25/06/2019

Before :

Double-click to add the Judges name

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

MB
Applicant

- and –

EB
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr P Mitchell (instructed by Vardags) for the Applicant husband
Mr N Cusworth QC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the Respondent wife

Hearing dates: 18th – 20th, 25th June

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE COHEN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from