Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

MARRIAGE: Assad v Kurter [2013] EWHC 3852 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:55 PM
Slug : marriage-assad-v-kurter-2013-ewhc-3852-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 10, 2013, 09:16 AM
Article ID : 104285

(Family Division, Moylan J, 5 December 2013)

The Syrian woman was a member of the Syrian Orthodox Church and lived in Syria until 2007 when she moved to England. The Turkish man was also at times a member of the same church and met the woman in Syria where they took part in a ceremony at the local Syrian Orthodox Church. A marriage was not registered with the authorities and the woman's status remained registered as single.

When the couple separated the woman obtained a religious divorce from the Syrian Orthodox Church and was presented with a certificate signed by the archbishop stating the marriage was dissolved. The woman filed a decree of divorce while the man claimed the ceremony was no more than a blessing and failed to create either a valid or void marriage and that , therefore, the woman was not entitled to a financial remedy under English law.

The English court had to determine the legality of the marriage by applying the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated. It had to determine the effect of the foreign law by reference to English law concepts and to decide what remedy under English law, if any, was available.

On the facts of this case, the ceremony was a marriage ceremony as was known and intended by both the man and woman. A legal marriage was not affected and the man was entitled to a decree of nullity. This was not a case of a non-marriage as both parties knew they were participating in a marriage ceremony which was capable of being made formally valid via the registration procedure following the ceremony. It was also capable of conferring the status of husband and wife if they had complied with the necessary formalities. In English law terms this was a void marriage. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from