Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

MAINTENANCE:Karoonian v CMEC; Gibbons v CMEC [2012] EWCA Civ 1379

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : maintenance-karoonian-v-cmec-gibbons-v-cmec-2012-ewca-civ-1379
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 6, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100809

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Richards, Patten LJJ, 30 October 2012)

Conjoined appeals were brought by non-resident parents who had all been committed to prison although on suspended terms for failure to meet their maintenance obligations as assessed by the CMEC and the CSA. The appellants claimed that s 39A of the Child Support Act 1991 was not compliant with the Human Rights Act 1998 and did not afford them the right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Default maintenance assessments had been made in respect of both appellants but neither had sought to have that assessment revised.

The appeals would be allowed and the orders for commitment set aside. A procedure properly applying s 39A of the CSA 1991 would be fully compliant with European Convention requirements, however, due to deficiencies in the process in respect of the two appellants their rights to a fair trial had not been protected.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from