Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

MAINTENANCE:Karoonian v CMEC; Gibbons v CMEC [2012] EWCA Civ 1379

Sep 29, 2018, 18:31 PM
Slug : maintenance-karoonian-v-cmec-gibbons-v-cmec-2012-ewca-civ-1379
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 6, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100809

(Court of Appeal, Ward, Richards, Patten LJJ, 30 October 2012)

Conjoined appeals were brought by non-resident parents who had all been committed to prison although on suspended terms for failure to meet their maintenance obligations as assessed by the CMEC and the CSA. The appellants claimed that s 39A of the Child Support Act 1991 was not compliant with the Human Rights Act 1998 and did not afford them the right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Art 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Default maintenance assessments had been made in respect of both appellants but neither had sought to have that assessment revised.

The appeals would be allowed and the orders for commitment set aside. A procedure properly applying s 39A of the CSA 1991 would be fully compliant with European Convention requirements, however, due to deficiencies in the process in respect of the two appellants their rights to a fair trial had not been protected.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from