Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

ABDUCTION: M v M [2008] EWHC 2049 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : m-v-m-2008-ewhc-2049-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 20, 2008, 09:39 AM
Article ID : 87195

(Family Division; Black J; 20 August 2008)

The Polish children were first retained by the Polish father in England at the end of a holiday. Under a consent order the father eventually returned the children to Poland, but subsequently used passports that had been cancelled by the Polish court to abduct the children back to England, concealing their destination. The mother issued Hague proceedings as soon as she had traced the children's whereabouts, but by the time the case came to court the children had lived in England for just over one year, raising the possibility of a defence of settlement under Hague Convention on Abduction, Art 12.

While the court must be careful not to be inappropriately influenced by the fact that a parent had behaved in a way open to considerable criticism, and it was accepted that it did not follow from the fact that a parent had been in a vulnerable and watchful state of mind that the children would have been unable to settle into their new environment, these two children, who had been very aware of the possibility that they might have to return to Poland, and had both been subjected to parental influence leading them to express extreme preferences for remaining in England, were not settled within Art 12.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from