Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Changes to the law on Domestic Abuse
Official statistics (ONS (2016), March 2015 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW)) show that around 2 million people suffer from some form of domestic abuse each year in the UK. In...
Managing costs in complex children cases
In November 2020 Spice Girl Mel B was in the news, despairing about how the legal costs of trying to relocate her daughter Madison from the US to England were likely to bankrupt her, leading to her...
View all articles

ABDUCTION: M v M [2008] EWHC 2049 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : m-v-m-2008-ewhc-2049-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 20, 2008, 09:39 AM
Article ID : 87195

(Family Division; Black J; 20 August 2008)

The Polish children were first retained by the Polish father in England at the end of a holiday. Under a consent order the father eventually returned the children to Poland, but subsequently used passports that had been cancelled by the Polish court to abduct the children back to England, concealing their destination. The mother issued Hague proceedings as soon as she had traced the children's whereabouts, but by the time the case came to court the children had lived in England for just over one year, raising the possibility of a defence of settlement under Hague Convention on Abduction, Art 12.

While the court must be careful not to be inappropriately influenced by the fact that a parent had behaved in a way open to considerable criticism, and it was accepted that it did not follow from the fact that a parent had been in a vulnerable and watchful state of mind that the children would have been unable to settle into their new environment, these two children, who had been very aware of the possibility that they might have to return to Poland, and had both been subjected to parental influence leading them to express extreme preferences for remaining in England, were not settled within Art 12.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from