Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

London Borough of Hackney v JC and Others [2015] EWHC 742 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 22:32 PM
In care proceedings the judge found that the 4-year-old child had been habitually resident in the UK throughout her life despite living a somewhat peripatetic existence.
Slug : london-borough-of-hackney-v-jc-and-others-2015-ewhc-742-famlondon-borough-of-hackney-v-jc-and-others-2015-ewhc-742-fam
Meta Title : London Borough of Hackney v JC and Others [2015] EWHC 742 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Jurisdiction – Habitual residence – Public law children proceedings – American mother and Moroccan father – Whether the child was habitually resident in the UK
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 23, 2015, 11:26 AM
Article ID : 116721
(Family Division, Hayden J, 19 March 2015)

 Jurisdiction – Habitual residence – Public law children proceedings – American mother and Moroccan father – Whether the child was habitually resident in the UK
 
Please see attached file below for the full judgment.


 In care proceedings the judge found that the 4-year-old child had been habitually resident in the UK throughout her life despite living a somewhat peripatetic existence.

 Care proceedings were initiated in relation to the 4-year-old child, of the American mother and Moroccan father after she was taken to hospital, having lost consciousness and suffering a serious and potentially life threatening episode. The mother admitted using inappropriate and physical chastisement and she was arrested. She was charged and one of her bail conditions prevented her from having unsupervised contact with her daughter.

 The child had been in foster care since 2013. Initially she was placed under a police protection order and subsequently under s 20 of the Children Act 1989.

 The mother was assessed by multi-disciplinary team and was found to display features of narcissistic and borderline personality disorder with some traits of antisocial and dependent personality disorder. During proceedings the issue of jurisdiction arose and it fell to be determined where the child was habitually resident.

 It was clear that the mother had lived a peripatetic existence in recent years but the UK was undoubtedly where she regarded her home and that was why she wished her daughter to be born her to gain British citizenship. During her time in Morocco she learnt no Arabic and did not improve her French. There was no sense of her integrating into life in Morocco. She had regularly returned to the UK and for most of the time the mother had been the child’s entire social and family environment. The child’s habitual residence was and had been throughout her life, like that of her mother, the UK.
  Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 742 (Fam)
 Case No: ZC14C00005

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
 FAMILY DIVISION

 Royal Courts of Justice
 Strand
 London
 WC2A 2LL

 Date: 19/03/2015

 
 
Before :

 MR JUSTICE HAYDEN

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Between :

 LONDON BOROUGH OF HACKNEY
 Applicant

 - and -

 JC
 1st Respondent
 -and-
 MR
 2nd Respondent
 -and-
 LV
 3rd Respondent
 -and-
 OV
 4th Respondent
 -and-
 SR (by her Child’s Guardian)
 5th Respondent

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 Finola Moore for the Local Authority
 Mr Henry Setright QC & Sally Bradley  (instructed by Freemans) for the 1st Respondent
 Mr Frank Feehan QC & Mr Chris Barnes (instructed by Goodman Ray) for the 2nd Respondent
 Mr and Mrs  OV in person
 Mr Edward Devereux for the child, SR, by her Children’s Guardian (instructed by Duncan Lewis)

 Hearing dates: 26th, 27th, 28th & 29th January 2015

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 

 Judgment

 London Borough of Hackney v JC and Others [2015] EWHC 742 (Fam)
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Jurisdiction
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from