Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Living with Re B-S: Re S and its implications for parents, local authorities and the courts

Sep 29, 2018, 21:56 PM
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Re B-S (Adoption: Application of s47(5)) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146, ​[2014] 1 FLR 1035 in September 2013 has had major implications for parents, local authorities and the courts.
Slug : living-with-re-b-s-re-s-and-its-implications-for-parents-local-authorities-and-the-courts
Meta Title : Living with Re B-S: Re S and its implications for parents, local authorities and the courts
Meta Keywords : family law, care proceedings, divorce, adoption
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 24, 2014, 09:30 AM
Article ID : 106193

Family Law

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Re B-S (Adoption: Application of s47(5)) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146, [2014] 1 FLR 1035 in September 2013 has had major implications for parents, local authorities and the courts. It has provoked a fundamental reappraisal of the use of adoption as a child protection mechanism and of the legal requirements which must be observed where placement orders are sought. The newly enacted Children and Families Act 2014 contains provisions relating to care and adoption which may be thought to pull in the opposite direction by encouraging the use of adoption and attempting to streamline the legal process relating to care and placement proceedings.

In this article, the authors look at the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Re S (Appeal from Care and Placement Orders) [2014] EWCA Civ 135, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at June [2014] Fam Law 774), in which the Father’s appeal was allowed and the care and placement orders made by the judge were set aside, as a study in what may now be required. The separate perspectives of parents and local authorities are considered from the authors’ vantage points as counsel for the father and counsel for the local authority respectively.


The full version of this article appears in the July 2014 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
boy_sad
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from