Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
View all articles
Authors

Living with Re B-S: Re S and its implications for parents, local authorities and the courts

Sep 29, 2018, 21:56 PM
Title : Living with Re B-S: Re S and its implications for parents, local authorities and the courts
Slug : living-with-re-b-s-re-s-and-its-implications-for-parents-local-authorities-and-the-courts
Meta Keywords : family law, care proceedings, divorce, adoption
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 24, 2014, 09:30 AM
Article ID : 106193

Family Law

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Re B-S (Adoption: Application of s47(5)) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146, [2014] 1 FLR 1035 in September 2013 has had major implications for parents, local authorities and the courts. It has provoked a fundamental reappraisal of the use of adoption as a child protection mechanism and of the legal requirements which must be observed where placement orders are sought. The newly enacted Children and Families Act 2014 contains provisions relating to care and adoption which may be thought to pull in the opposite direction by encouraging the use of adoption and attempting to streamline the legal process relating to care and placement proceedings.

In this article, the authors look at the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Re S (Appeal from Care and Placement Orders) [2014] EWCA Civ 135, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported at June [2014] Fam Law 774), in which the Father’s appeal was allowed and the care and placement orders made by the judge were set aside, as a study in what may now be required. The separate perspectives of parents and local authorities are considered from the authors’ vantage points as counsel for the father and counsel for the local authority respectively.


The full version of this article appears in the July 2014 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
boy_sad
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from