Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Length of High Court financial remedy case skeleton arguments to be reduced

Sep 29, 2018, 22:49 PM
family law, financial remedy hearings, Mostyn J, guidance, length, skeleton arguments, efficient conduct, high court judge
The recent drive to ensure court documents are kept concise is continuing, with Mostyn J revising his guidance on the efficient conduct of financial remedy hearings allocated to a High Court Judge.
Slug : length-of-high-court-financial-remedy-case-skeleton-arguments-to-be-reduced
Meta Title : Length of High Court financial remedy case skeleton arguments to be reduced
Meta Keywords : family law, financial remedy hearings, Mostyn J, guidance, length, skeleton arguments, efficient conduct, high court judge
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 20, 2016, 05:34 AM
Article ID : 111401

The recent drive to ensure court documents are kept concise is continuing, with Mostyn J revising his guidance on the efficient conduct of financial remedy hearings allocated to a High Court Judge. This follows on from the President’s  latest consultation on PD27A, in which he asked practitioners’ views on regulating the length of individual documents, such as chronologies, skeletons and witness statements (amongst others).

Mostyn J’s guidance, which was last revised in July 2015, only applies to a small proportion of financial remedy cases – those that have hearings allocated to a High Court Judge (whether sitting at the RCJ or elsewhere).

Paragraph 15 of the guidance has been altered to limit the length of skeleton arguments submitted to court.  Previously a skeleton argument could not exceed 25 pages, this has now been reduced as follows:

‘i.  For the first appointment, or any other interim hearing, 10 pages

(including  any attached schedules);

ii.  For the FDR 15 pages (excluding agreed documents but including

any  other appended schedules);

iii.  For the final hearing 20 pages (excluding agreed documents

under  para 13 above, but including any other appended

schedules).’

Paragraph 16, which provides that if a skeleton is going to exceed a certain length a direction to that effect should be sought at the Pre-Trial Review, has also been revised to change the page limit from 25 pages to 20.

The revised guidance will take effect from 1 February 2016 and the whole document can be found here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
news_1
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from