Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

LOCAL AUTHORITY/NEGLIGENCE: Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 446

Sep 29, 2018, 17:15 PM
Slug : lawrence-v-pembrokeshire-county-council-2007-ewca-civ-446
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 22, 2007, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87607

(Court of Appeal; Auld, Scott Baker and Richards LJJ; 15 May 2007)

A local authority did not owe a duty of care to a parent of a child when exercising, through its social workers, its duties to protect children from their parents, in this instance by placing them on the Child Protection Register as being at risk; the common law was, in this respect, unchanged by the introduction of the right to respect for family life under Art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (the Convention). Art 8 did not undermine or weaken the primacy of the need to protect children from abuse or the risk of abuse from, among others, their parents. The common law protected from malice or bad faith, but not from a well-intentioned but negligent mistake; the provision of a discrete Convention remedy did not necessitate a change of the common law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from