Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
View all articles
Authors

Law Commission Cohabitation Report Published

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Title : Law Commission Cohabitation Report Published
Slug : law-commission-cohabitation-report-published
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 1, 2007, 04:19 AM
Article ID : 85435

The Law Commission published its report Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown on 31 July, recommending the introduction of a new scheme of financial remedies which would not apply to all cohabitants and where it did apply would only give rise to remedies relating to contributions made to the relationship. The Commission has concluded in the light of consultation that reform is necessary: financial remedies would respond to the economic impact of the parties contributions to the relationship and first consideration would be given to any dependent children of the couple. Cohabitants would not be expected to meet each others future needs by means of maintenance payments and there would be no principle that the parties should share their assets equally. The scheme would apply to those couples who have had a child together or who have lived together for a minimum period.

The Commission recommends that the minimum period for couples without children should be set within a range of two to five years. Couples who wished to do so could opt out of the scheme by a written agreement to that effect. They would then be free to make their own arrangements for what would happen to their assets in the event of separation. The report makes recommendations to Government. It will be for Government to decide whether and when to introduce legislation in Parliament in order to implement them. The recommendations apply only to England and Wales. In Scotland, cohabitants have had access to statutory remedies on separation since May 2006. For more information see September [2007] Fam Law. For the full report see http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/cohabitation.htm.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from