Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles

Latest Family Court statistics show divorces are taking longer

Mar 29, 2019, 13:00 PM
court statistics, family law, ministry of justice
The Ministry of Justice has published the latest quarterly edition of statistics on the Family Courts.
Slug :
Meta Title : Latest Family Court statistics show divorces are taking longer
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : Yes
Date : Mar 29, 2019, 12:51 PM
Article ID :

The Ministry of Justice has published the latest quarterly edition of statistics on the Family Courts. 

Of particular note were the findings that: 

  • There was a continued creeping up of how long divorce is taking - for those granted decree nisi, the average time from petition to decree nisi and decree absolute were each up 5 weeks to 29 weeks and 54 weeks respectively, the highest figures so far for the periods covered by the bulletin.
  • There is clear evidence of cases taking longer – public law (care) cases have gone up by 2 weeks year on year, to 30 weeks, despite the 26 week rule introduced in 2014.  Only 49% of cases were disposed of within 26 weeks, a decrease of 8% year on year.

Jo Edwards, Head of Family at Forsters LLP comments:

“The latest Family Court quarterly statistics (for the period October to December 2018, and therefore completing the stats for 2018) show some worrying trends becoming embedded into people’s day to day experience of the family justice system. Although courts modernisation, and the move to online divorce and increasing digitisation, are welcome, the reality is that those changes will take time and in the meantime the effect of the swathes of court closures and other cuts in the MoJ budget, coupled with the huge rise in the number of applications year on year and the continued growth in the number of unrepresented litigants, mean that the family courts continue to buckle under the weight of pressure and are at absolute breaking point. 
On every single measure – number of applications being issued/needing determination, the amount of time divorces and other private law applications are taking to be disposed of, the failure to meet the 26 week rule in the majority of public law cases, the huge swathes of litigants in person in the system – it feels as though the court system is failing. That is not for want of effort on the part of those who work in the family justice system, but due to chronic underfunding, the impact of court closures before the courts modernisation programme has caught up and the impact of the legal aid cuts 6 years on. It is also interesting to reflect 5 years on upon the effect of the huge swathe of changes which were introduced in the family justice system in April 2014 – including the coming into being of the single family court, new child arrangements orders (meant to  reduce litigation by abolishing ‘residence’ and ‘contact’), the 26 week rule in care cases, the statutory MIAM (intended to divert more cases away from court but not having that effect), and see what more can be done.
Unfortunately, there is a perfect storm of factors which is leading the family court ever closer to the brink. The long-awaited impact assessment of the legal aid cuts has failed to deliver much which will be tangible benefit to family cases, and the courts modernisation programme has recently been extended. All the while, too many are left having to represent themselves; or get to court to find that no judge is available to hear their case following all the cuts. Although the move to privatised justice has helped those who can afford to pay to have a private judge, the many thousands of other families passing through the family courts each year who are unable to resolve their issues are entitled to know that a judge will be available to determine their case swiftly and having heard all the facts.”
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from