Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: L v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and Secretary of State for Health

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : l-v-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-and-secretary-of-state-for-health
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 3, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87283

(Family Division; Charles J; 3 October 2008)

The deceased husband's sperm, having been retrieved by the wife on the basis of a court order, would be preserved pending a final decision on the possible export of such sperm for the purpose of fertility treatment for the wife under the discretion given to the Human Fertility and Embryology Agency by Human Fertility and Embryology Act 1990, s 24(4). The storage of the gametes for use in the UK was not possible because there had been no effective consent by the husband, who had died unexpectedly; the need for effective consent to storage in the UK for subsequent use in the UK was not incompatible with the wife's rights under European Convention on Human Rights. The court expressed preliminary views on a number of questions relating to the possible exercise of the discretion to allow export of the gametes, in particular suggesting that the Agency could consider and grant a special direction that permitted storage and export of gametes prior to retrieval, although it would rarely do so if effective consent to such storage and use had not been given, but that otherwise it was not possibly lawfully to remove or authorise the removal of gametes from a dead person who had not given an effective advanced consent to this.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from