Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
View all articles
Authors

MEDICAL TREATMENT: L v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and Secretary of State for Health

Sep 29, 2018, 17:11 PM
Slug : l-v-human-fertilisation-and-embryology-authority-and-secretary-of-state-for-health
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 3, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 87283

(Family Division; Charles J; 3 October 2008)

The deceased husband's sperm, having been retrieved by the wife on the basis of a court order, would be preserved pending a final decision on the possible export of such sperm for the purpose of fertility treatment for the wife under the discretion given to the Human Fertility and Embryology Agency by Human Fertility and Embryology Act 1990, s 24(4). The storage of the gametes for use in the UK was not possible because there had been no effective consent by the husband, who had died unexpectedly; the need for effective consent to storage in the UK for subsequent use in the UK was not incompatible with the wife's rights under European Convention on Human Rights. The court expressed preliminary views on a number of questions relating to the possible exercise of the discretion to allow export of the gametes, in particular suggesting that the Agency could consider and grant a special direction that permitted storage and export of gametes prior to retrieval, although it would rarely do so if effective consent to such storage and use had not been given, but that otherwise it was not possibly lawfully to remove or authorise the removal of gametes from a dead person who had not given an effective advanced consent to this.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from