Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
ASSISTED REPRODUCTION:Knecht v Romania (App No 10048/10)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Oct 11, 2012, 02:34 AM
Article ID :100481
(European Court of Human Rights, 2 October 2012)
The applicant had embryos stored at a fertility clinic in Romania. When a criminal investigation took place at the clinic the embryos were moved to the institute of forensic medicine, a State facility, which was not authorised to function as a genetic bank. The woman alleged a breach of her Art 8 rights under the European Convention in respect of her being prevented from becoming a parent.
The court held there had been no violation of the woman's Art 8 rights. During the proceedings arrangements were made for the embryos to be moved to a fully licensed fertility clinic. Despite the fact that the applicant maintained her consent had not been sought for the transfer and that she had not had the opportunity to select the clinic herself it had not been demonstrated that the State had failed to strike a fair balance between the competing interests.