Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Kearns v France (ECHR)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : kearns-v-france-echr
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86847

(European Court of Human Rights; 10 January 2008)

An Irish mother had travelled to France in order to have a private birth, to be registered anonymously and followed by adoption of the child. The conditions and effects of anonymous registration of the birth were explained to her in two lengthy interviews, involving medically qualified interpreters; the explanation included the fact that there was a 2-month period within which the mother could request the return of the child. The mother consented to the adoption on the day after the birth. Over 5 months later the mother sought to have the child returned to her; the child had in the meantime been placed with a foster family with a view to adoption. The mother claimed that her human rights had been breached, in that the 2-month period was too short, and that she had been provided with insufficient linguistic assistance.

It had been in the interests of the child to enjoy stable emotional relations within a new family as quickly as possible; the 2 month time limit appeared sufficient to allow the mother time to reflect and to reconsider her decision to give the child up. The French authorities had provided the mother with sufficient and detailed information, affording her linguistic assistance not required by law and ensuring that she was informed as thoroughly as possible of the consequences of her choice. There had been no breach of the mother's rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from