Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Kearns v France (ECHR)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : kearns-v-france-echr
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86847

(European Court of Human Rights; 10 January 2008)

An Irish mother had travelled to France in order to have a private birth, to be registered anonymously and followed by adoption of the child. The conditions and effects of anonymous registration of the birth were explained to her in two lengthy interviews, involving medically qualified interpreters; the explanation included the fact that there was a 2-month period within which the mother could request the return of the child. The mother consented to the adoption on the day after the birth. Over 5 months later the mother sought to have the child returned to her; the child had in the meantime been placed with a foster family with a view to adoption. The mother claimed that her human rights had been breached, in that the 2-month period was too short, and that she had been provided with insufficient linguistic assistance.

It had been in the interests of the child to enjoy stable emotional relations within a new family as quickly as possible; the 2 month time limit appeared sufficient to allow the mother time to reflect and to reconsider her decision to give the child up. The French authorities had provided the mother with sufficient and detailed information, affording her linguistic assistance not required by law and ensuring that she was informed as thoroughly as possible of the consequences of her choice. There had been no breach of the mother's rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from