Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

ADOPTION: Kearns v France (ECHR)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:07 PM
Slug : kearns-v-france-echr
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 18, 2008, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 86847

(European Court of Human Rights; 10 January 2008)

An Irish mother had travelled to France in order to have a private birth, to be registered anonymously and followed by adoption of the child. The conditions and effects of anonymous registration of the birth were explained to her in two lengthy interviews, involving medically qualified interpreters; the explanation included the fact that there was a 2-month period within which the mother could request the return of the child. The mother consented to the adoption on the day after the birth. Over 5 months later the mother sought to have the child returned to her; the child had in the meantime been placed with a foster family with a view to adoption. The mother claimed that her human rights had been breached, in that the 2-month period was too short, and that she had been provided with insufficient linguistic assistance.

It had been in the interests of the child to enjoy stable emotional relations within a new family as quickly as possible; the 2 month time limit appeared sufficient to allow the mother time to reflect and to reconsider her decision to give the child up. The French authorities had provided the mother with sufficient and detailed information, affording her linguistic assistance not required by law and ensuring that she was informed as thoroughly as possible of the consequences of her choice. There had been no breach of the mother's rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from