Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

ANCILLARY RELIEF: K v K (Periodical Payments: Cohabitation) [2005] EWHC 2886 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:22 PM
Slug : k-v-k-periodical-payments-cohabitation-2005-ewhc-2886-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 16, 2005, 09:57 AM
Article ID : 86301

(Family Division; Coleridge J; 16 December 2005)

Under a consent order the wife was to receive continuing periodical payments at the rate of £16,000 index linked during joint lives or until the wife's remarriage. The husband applied for a downward variation, based on his own imminent 47% drop in income, but also on the wife's 3-year cohabitation.
The court must nowadays factor into its analysis and calculations not only numerically, but in principle, the existence of a lengthy and settled period of cohabitation and the likelihood of its continuing indefinitely. Whatever reduction was ordered, a wife must be entitled to a tapering off of the liability to allow her to acclimatise. There was no reason why nowadays the court should not order a termination on cohabitation after a certain period. It had been necessary in this case to review the overall financial picture of both households; parties cohabiting were required to be as financially open as married couples.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from