Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Judicial inconsistency and the family court system

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : judicial-inconsistency-and-the-family-court-system
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2007, 05:54 AM
Article ID : 85441
In an unusual perspective on the family court system, the author, a solicitor, recounts his experience of a contact application in respect of his grandchild, after the death of his son. The application made its way through four different hearings before four different judges before it was abandoned. Examining the features of the things that went wrong in the case, the author identifies an inconsistency in approach to the various issues including leave to apply for a contact order, jurisdiction to order conciliation hearings and the issue of delay. In this case the fact of having four different judges also caused serious difficulties in itself. Considering the relationship between conciliation within the court system and mediation outside it, the need is identified for rationalisation and development of mediation and conciliation in family cases. The system appears to have the resources required to function successfully, but the contention is that there are serious flaws in the organisation and application of those resources. For the full article see August [2007] Fam Law.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from