Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Judicial inconsistency and the family court system

Sep 29, 2018, 16:33 PM
Slug : judicial-inconsistency-and-the-family-court-system
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 8, 2007, 05:54 AM
Article ID : 85441
In an unusual perspective on the family court system, the author, a solicitor, recounts his experience of a contact application in respect of his grandchild, after the death of his son. The application made its way through four different hearings before four different judges before it was abandoned. Examining the features of the things that went wrong in the case, the author identifies an inconsistency in approach to the various issues including leave to apply for a contact order, jurisdiction to order conciliation hearings and the issue of delay. In this case the fact of having four different judges also caused serious difficulties in itself. Considering the relationship between conciliation within the court system and mediation outside it, the need is identified for rationalisation and development of mediation and conciliation in family cases. The system appears to have the resources required to function successfully, but the contention is that there are serious flaws in the organisation and application of those resources. For the full article see August [2007] Fam Law.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from