Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re M (Special Guardianship Order: Leave To Apply To Discharge) [2021] EWCA Civ 442
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Peter Jackson, Baker, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 26 March 2021)Public Law Children – Special guardianship – Leave to apply to discharge SGO – Refusal...
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam)
(Family Division, Lieven J, 26 March 2021)Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in Bell – Whether parents could...
Re H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), President, King, Holroyde LJJ, 30 March 2021)Private law children - Domestic Abuse – Fact finding – ApproachThe Court of Appeal provided guidance in four...
Unequal chances? Ethnic disproportionality in child welfare and family justice
Many have experienced their own Black Lives Matter moment in the last 12 months, a sharp realisation of entrenched prejudices and inequalities that still exist in our society.In the family justice...
Violence Against Women and Girls Call for Evidence reopened
The government is seeking views to help inform the development of the next Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy. They are particularly keen to hear from people who may feel...
View all articles
Authors

JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)

Mar 5, 2021, 17:58 PM
Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19 prevented travel – Whether the mother had wrongfully retained the children – Acquiescence
The father’s application for a return order was refused on the basis that the Hague Convention was not invoked or that the father had acquiesced.
Slug :
Meta Title : JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19 prevented travel – Whether the mother had wrongfully retained the children – Acquiescence
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 5, 2021, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)

Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19 prevented travel – Whether the mother had wrongfully retained the children – Acquiescence

The father’s application for a return order was refused on the basis that the Hague Convention was not invoked or that the father had acquiesced.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court nd European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)

Case No: FD20P00677

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Sitting remotely

Date: 22/02/2021

Before :

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

JM
Applicant

- and -

RM
Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Katy Chokowry (instructed by IFLG LLP) for the Applicant
Mark Jarman (instructed by MSB Sols) for the respondent

Hearing dates: 15-16 February 2021

The case was heard remotely using Microsoft Teams

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

.............................

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)

 

Categories :
  • Abduction
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from