Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

LOCAL AUTHORITY: JE v DE (By the Official Solicitor) Surrey County Council and EW [2006] EWHC 3459 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:33 PM
Slug : je-v-de-by-the-official-solicitor-surrey-county-council-and-ew-2006-ewhc-3459-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 29, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88217

(Family Division; Munby J; 29 December 2006)

A 76 year old man, blind and with significant short-term memory loss, who had been placed in a residential care home, but who repeatedly expressed his wish to go to live with his wife at home, had been and continued to be deprived of his liberty by the local authority. The simple reality was that the man would be permitted to leave the residential care home, and released into the wife's care, only as and when the authority considered it to be appropriate. A person could be as effectively deprived of his liberty by the misuse or misrepresentation of even non-existent authority as by locked doors and physical barriers. A final hearing was to determine issues of capacity and justification.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from