Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

INTERIM CARE ORDERS: Re B (Children); MB v County Council, AB and KB and EB [2010] EWCA Civ 324

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Slug : interim-care-orders-re-b-children-mb-v-county-council-ab-and-kb-and-eb-2010-ewca-civ-324
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 30, 2010, 11:00 AM
Article ID : 90789

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Wall and Aikens LJJ; 30 March 2010)

The judge made an interim care order to permit the local authority to place the two younger children with foster carers pending an assessment of the mother's ability to care for her children. The two older children had expressed a very strong desire to return to the mother's care, and on practical grounds this had been agreed by the local authority. The main focus was whether the mother was able to disengage from a relationship with the violent father.

The appeal was dismissed. Interim care orders were an appropriate mechanism to achieve the local authority's objective. Once the threshold criteria was met (and it was accepted that they had been), whether or not an interim care orders were made was a welfare issue, and did not involve a test whether there was 'an urgent need to keep the children from their mother'. Interim care orders could last only 8 weeks from the date of the first order and 4 weeks from all subsequent orders however long it was going to take for the final hearing to come on. It had been imperative that the sensible conditions that the authority was offering the mother for return of the children should have been reduced to writing.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from