Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

INHERENT JURISDICTION/ HUMAN TISSUE ACT 2004: CM v Executor of the Estate of EJ (Deceased) and Her Majesty’s Coroner for the Southern District of London [2013] EWHC 1680 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Slug : inherent-jurisdiction-human-tissue-act-2004-cm-v-executor-of-the-estate-of-ej-deceased-and-her-majestys-coroner-for-the-southern-district-of-london-2013-ewhc-1680-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 19, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 102887

(Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2013)

The applicant, a medical consultant and professor, while driving came across the body of a woman lying motionless on a pavement, who was later found to have fallen from a nearby building. The doctor performed emergency first aid but despite her efforts and those of the paramedics the woman was pronounced dead.

After attending the body and washing the deceased's blood from her hands she found a number of abrasions to her own skin. She undertook a course of prophylactic antiretroviral medication, due to the risk of contracting a blood-borne disease from the deceased, from which she had suffered significant, unpleasant short-term side effects. The doctor sought to establish whether she was at risk of contracting any serious blood-borne diseases by testing the deceased's blood. The Coroner concluded that he had no objections to testing being carried out although he had no free-standing power to permit testing.

During the police investigation it was established that the deceased was a foreign national with only one relative living in the UK who was her mother's cousin. When contacted she informed the police that the parents had not yet been informed but that she would offer her consent to testing on their behalf. The doctor sought a declaration under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court that the taking of samples and testing would be lawful.

It was not reasonably practicable to seek the consent of the parents of the deceased within the time available. The parents were currently unaware of their daughter's death and there were no other relatives who would be considered as qualifying persons within the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004.

Consideration was given to the high importance to be placed on respecting the integrity of the deceased's body but also of the doctor's act of great humanity in administering first aid and the relative's sincere appreciation of that act. If testing were not carried out the doctor would live for the foreseeable future in a state of profound anxious uncertainty as to whether she had contracted a serious, life-threatening illness. Declarations as to the lawfulness of removing samples and carrying out testing were granted. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from