Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles

INHERENT JURISDICTION/ HUMAN TISSUE ACT 2004: CM v Executor of the Estate of EJ (Deceased) and Her Majesty’s Coroner for the Southern District of London [2013] EWHC 1680 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Slug : inherent-jurisdiction-human-tissue-act-2004-cm-v-executor-of-the-estate-of-ej-deceased-and-her-majestys-coroner-for-the-southern-district-of-london-2013-ewhc-1680-fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 19, 2013, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 102887

(Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2013)

The applicant, a medical consultant and professor, while driving came across the body of a woman lying motionless on a pavement, who was later found to have fallen from a nearby building. The doctor performed emergency first aid but despite her efforts and those of the paramedics the woman was pronounced dead.

After attending the body and washing the deceased's blood from her hands she found a number of abrasions to her own skin. She undertook a course of prophylactic antiretroviral medication, due to the risk of contracting a blood-borne disease from the deceased, from which she had suffered significant, unpleasant short-term side effects. The doctor sought to establish whether she was at risk of contracting any serious blood-borne diseases by testing the deceased's blood. The Coroner concluded that he had no objections to testing being carried out although he had no free-standing power to permit testing.

During the police investigation it was established that the deceased was a foreign national with only one relative living in the UK who was her mother's cousin. When contacted she informed the police that the parents had not yet been informed but that she would offer her consent to testing on their behalf. The doctor sought a declaration under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court that the taking of samples and testing would be lawful.

It was not reasonably practicable to seek the consent of the parents of the deceased within the time available. The parents were currently unaware of their daughter's death and there were no other relatives who would be considered as qualifying persons within the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004.

Consideration was given to the high importance to be placed on respecting the integrity of the deceased's body but also of the doctor's act of great humanity in administering first aid and the relative's sincere appreciation of that act. If testing were not carried out the doctor would live for the foreseeable future in a state of profound anxious uncertainty as to whether she had contracted a serious, life-threatening illness. Declarations as to the lawfulness of removing samples and carrying out testing were granted. 


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from