Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

Inadequacies of FPR 2010: drafting court documents

Sep 29, 2018, 21:46 PM
Title : Inadequacies of FPR 2010: drafting court documents
Slug : inadequacies-of-fpr-2010-drafting-court-documents
Meta Keywords : family law, fpr, reform
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 1, 2014, 06:30 AM
Article ID : 105357

Her Honour Nasreen Pearce

This article deals with the need for reform of the FPR 2010 by reference to recent decisions in Re LC (Reunite: International Child Abduction Centre Intervening) [2014] UKSC 1, [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming) and NN v ZZ and Others (Stranded Spouse) [2013] EWHC 2261, [2013] Fam Law 1523 and with the proposed introduction of mandatory ‘standard order'. It warns against changes to practice and procedure and court forms being introduced which: (a) are in direct contradiction to the well researched view that practice and procedure in all jurisdictions and at all levels should be uniform; (b)overlook the difficulties  which would invariably arise when proceedings engage both the civil and family jurisdiction; and (c) fail to have regard to the impact on  those who do not have legal representation  and who often are the most vulnerable in society.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2014 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from