Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

In Re P: adoption, discrimination and the best interests of the child [2010] CFLQ 115

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Slug : in-re-p-adoption-discrimination-and-the-best-interests-of-the-child-2010-cflq-115
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 8, 2011, 04:32 AM
Article ID : 95605

This commentary examines the House of Lords' decision in Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couples) concerning the exclusion of an unmarried couple to adopt under Article 9 of the Adoption (Northern Ireland) Order 1987. It considers the House of Lords' conclusion that the exclusion amounted to discrimination on the ground of marital status contrary to Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (ECHR), read together with Article 14. Relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights is considered, and the role played by the welfare principle in adoption is analysed. The piece then outlines an alternative line of reasoning - based on the positive obligation to respect family life under Article 8 - on which the case might have been decided.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from