Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

In Re P: adoption, discrimination and the best interests of the child [2010] CFLQ 115

Sep 29, 2018, 17:49 PM
Slug : in-re-p-adoption-discrimination-and-the-best-interests-of-the-child-2010-cflq-115
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 8, 2011, 04:32 AM
Article ID : 95605

This commentary examines the House of Lords' decision in Re P (Adoption: Unmarried Couples) concerning the exclusion of an unmarried couple to adopt under Article 9 of the Adoption (Northern Ireland) Order 1987. It considers the House of Lords' conclusion that the exclusion amounted to discrimination on the ground of marital status contrary to Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (ECHR), read together with Article 14. Relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights is considered, and the role played by the welfare principle in adoption is analysed. The piece then outlines an alternative line of reasoning - based on the positive obligation to respect family life under Article 8 - on which the case might have been decided.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from