Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
View all articles
Authors

In a New York adoption state of mind

Sep 29, 2018, 22:51 PM
family law, adoption, New York, non-consensual adoption, reform, child care system, law and practice, jurisdictions, parallels, delay, failings, remedial action, proposal
Title : In a New York adoption state of mind
Slug : in-a-new-york-adoption-state-of-mind
Meta Keywords : family law, adoption, New York, non-consensual adoption, reform, child care system, law and practice, jurisdictions, parallels, delay, failings, remedial action, proposal
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Feb 26, 2016, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 111687
Over the last couple of years there has been much public concern, and comment from the senior judiciary and politicians, about the time taken to decide the future of children removed from their birth families as a result of neglect or abuse.

A particular concern, for a care system that perceives adoption as being the 'gold standard' amongst the options for care of such children, is the time taken to place children with an adoptive family.

This article draws attention to similar concerns being expressed in one of the very few jurisdictions that also views non-consensual adoption in this way, the United States, and looks in particular at a recently commenced Federal lawsuit that challenges the failings of, and seeks to impose reform in, New York City's child care system.

It gives a brief overview of child care law and practice in New York and includes references to sources of more detailed information. It also draws on the writer's experience of observing the New York courts in action. Interesting parallels emerge between the two jurisdictions as to the causes and extent of delay and of other failings within child care systems and as to some of the remedial action proposed.  

The full version of this article appears in the February 2016 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full version of the article here.

For details on how you can subscribe to any Family Law or any other title contact Tel 0117 917 5100, or email: editor@jordanpublishing.co.uk      
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
new_york_state_of_adoption
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Load more comments
Comment by from