The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
The Government must address four priorities for the justice system in negotiating the UK's new relationship with the EU, says the Justice Committee in its report 'Implications of Brexit for the justice system'.
Meta Title :Implications of Brexit for the justice system
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 22, 2017, 10:17 AM
Article ID :113980
The Government must address four priorities for the justice system in negotiating the UK's new relationship with the EU, says the Justice Select Committee in its report 'Implications of Brexit for the justice system'.
Brexit can be realised in innumerably many ways, each with divergent consequences in different sectors of policy importance: the Justice Select Committee investigated its implications for the justice system to inform the Government - and Parliamentary and public debates - on key priorities for criminal justice, civil law and the legal services sector.
In civil justice, EU regulations establish procedures on choice of jurisdiction, and mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, for transnational disputes. Protecting the UK as a top-class commercial law centre should be a major priority for the Government given the clear impacts on the economy of failure to do so. In its report, the Justice Select Committee recommends that the Government look to replicate existing provisions as closely as possible.
Similar provisions in family law provide greater speed in child abduction cases, for example, and represent improvements over their default alternatives. The Committee believes that a role for the Court of Justice of the European Union in respect of these essentially procedural regulations is a price worth paying to maintain effective cross-border tools of justice.
The UK’s legal services sector makes a £25.7 billion annual economic contribution. It relies on openness, and its lawyers’ current rights to practice across EU Member States help small businesses and ordinary people as well as large firms and wealthy individuals. The report recommends that the Government protect these powers and should also outline steps it will take to provide opportunities for the sector more broadly - with concerted efforts by EU law firms to use Brexit to win clients from UK competitors - although the Committee has faith in UK legal services’ fundamental strengths.
The report recommends that the four principal aims of the Government’s approach to justice matters in Brexit negotiations be:
Continuing cooperation on criminal justice as closely as possible
Maintaining access to the EU’s valuable regulations on interstate commercial law
Enabling cross-border legal practice rights and opportunities
Retaining efficient mechanisms to resolve family law cases involving EU Member States and the UK