Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
No fault divorce - the end of the blame game
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, which passed into law on 25 June 2020, will introduce "no fault" divorce in England and Wales for the first time. This article looks at what it...
New Cafcass guidance on working with children during COVID-19
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) has published guidance on working with children during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The guidance sets out arrangements for...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

Implications of Brexit for the justice system

Sep 29, 2018, 19:48 PM
Brexit, Justice Select Committee, Report
The Government must address four priorities for the justice system in negotiating the UK's new relationship with the EU, says the Justice Committee in its report 'Implications of Brexit for the justice system'.
Slug : implications-of-brexit-for-the-justice-system
Meta Title : Implications of Brexit for the justice system
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 22, 2017, 10:17 AM
Article ID : 113980
The Government must address four priorities for the justice system in negotiating the UK's new relationship with the EU, says the Justice Select Committee in its report 'Implications of Brexit for the justice system'.

Brexit can be realised in innumerably many ways, each with divergent consequences in different sectors of policy importance: the Justice Select Committee investigated its implications for the justice system to inform the Government - and Parliamentary and public debates - on key priorities for criminal justice, civil law and the legal services sector.

In civil justice, EU regulations establish procedures on choice of jurisdiction, and mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, for transnational disputes. Protecting the UK as a top-class commercial law centre should be a major priority for the Government given the clear impacts on the economy of failure to do so. In its report, the Justice Select Committee recommends that the Government look to replicate existing provisions as closely as possible.

Similar provisions in family law provide greater speed in child abduction cases, for example, and represent improvements over their default alternatives. The Committee believes that a role for the Court of Justice of the European Union in respect of these essentially procedural regulations is a price worth paying to maintain effective cross-border tools of justice.

The UK’s legal services sector makes a £25.7 billion annual economic contribution. It relies on openness, and its lawyers’ current rights to practice across EU Member States help small businesses and ordinary people as well as large firms and wealthy individuals. The report recommends that the Government protect these powers and should also outline steps it will take to provide opportunities for the sector more broadly - with concerted efforts by EU law firms to use Brexit to win clients from UK competitors - although the Committee has faith in UK legal services’ fundamental strengths.

The report recommends that the four principal aims of the Government’s approach to justice matters in Brexit negotiations be:
  1. Continuing cooperation on criminal justice as closely as possible
  2. Maintaining access to the EU’s valuable regulations on interstate commercial law
  3. Enabling cross-border legal practice rights and opportunities
  4. Retaining efficient mechanisms to resolve family law cases involving EU Member States and the UK
Click here to read the full report.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Brexit_jigsaw
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from