Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles

Imagining Islam ... of meaning and metaphor symbolising the jilbab - R (Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School [2007] CFLQ 247

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Slug : imagining-islam-of-meaning-and-metaphor-symbolising-the-jilbab-r-begum-v-headteacher-and-governors-of-denbigh-high-school-2007-cflq-247
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 19, 2011, 05:12 AM
Article ID : 95759

This commentary examines the decision of the House of Lords in R (Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School in which the majority held that Shabina Begum's right to and manifestation of religious belief was not infringed. I consider first whether the current case and the Strasbourg jurisprudence upon which the House of Lords relied interpret the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 in a way that protects or undermines religious freedom. Secondly, I consider how far and to what extent the principle of ‘Gillick competence' and the applicant's right to self-determination formed a part of their Lordships' deliberations. Thirdly, I consider to what extent the family dynamics of the applicant were considered by the House. Finally, I consider whether in their understanding of dress code and its application in their imaginings of Islam, the courts too readily accepted evidence that viewed the shalwa kameeze as archetypal of Islamic dress, and also too readily accepted as true the meaning which Ms Begum attached to the jilbab.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from