Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

ICO reports that MoJ fails to provide a response to family law data request

Sep 29, 2018, 19:55 PM
freedom of information, MoJ
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has ruled against the MoJ because it failed to provide a response to family law data request.
Slug : ico-reports-that-moj-fails-to-provide-a-response-to-family-law-data-request
Meta Title : ICO reports that MoJ fails to provide a response to family law data request
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 23, 2017, 09:28 AM
Article ID : 114142

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has ruled against the MoJ because it failed to provide a response to a family law data request.

The ICO’s decision notice states that the unnamed complainant requested information relating to statistical data about court orders made in the Family Court together with information about domestic violence and child protection matters. The ICO added that by the date of its notice, 9 March 2017, the MoJ had yet to provide a substantive response to this request.

As a result, the Commissioner’s decision was that the MoJ has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in that it failed to provide a response to the request within the statutory timeframe of 20 working days. The Commissioner required the MoJ to comply with the request or issue a valid refusal notice as set out in section 17 of the FOIA within 35 calendar days of the date of the decision notice.


Family law solicitor and arbitrator, Tony Roe, made a series of FoI requests of the MoJ in 2014/15 about divorce centres. His research broke the news that Bury St Edmunds (BSE) would be the single divorce centre for the London & the South East. He comments:

'It is rather worrying that the MoJ has had to be brought to task over this issue. The MoJ’s breach flies in the face of the much-heralded transparency initiative of the President of the Family Division.

It is also concerning that the ICO noted that the delay in responding to this request will be logged as part of its ongoing monitoring of the MoJ’s compliance with the FOIA'.

Click here to read the full decision.



Categories :
  • News
Tags :
ICO
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from