Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Rattan v Kuwad [2021] EWCA Civ 1
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Macur, Moylan and Asplin LJJ, 11 January 2021)Financial remedies – Maintenance pending suit – Order set aside – AppealThe wife’s appeal from...
SMO (a child) (by their litigation friend (acting as a representative claimant pursuant to CPR 19.6)) v TikTok Inc. and others [2020] EWHC 3589 (QB)
(Queen's Bench Division, Warby J, 30 December 2020)Practice and procedure - Anonymity – 12-year-old bringing claim against TikTok for breach of data protection legislation – Claimant...
Coronavirus: Separated Families and Contact with Children in Care FAQs (UK)
The House of Commons Library has published a paper providing brief information in response to some key questions regarding the impact of the Coronavirus outbreak on separated families,...
The Benefit Of Cohabitation Agreements
Many couples in Britain today live together without being married or forming a civil partnership. For some, the legal status of this situation isn’t well understood - do unmarried cohabitants...
Wills and Coronavirus
With the coronavirus pandemic we have seen a significant increase in demand for Wills. However, the social distancing, lockdown and shielding measures introduced by the Government to help fight the...
View all articles
Authors

High Court to hear systemic challenge to the operation of the Government’s legal aid Exceptional Case Funding scheme

Sep 29, 2018, 22:09 PM
family law, access to justice, litigants in person, legal aid cuts, exceptional case funding, ECF, public law project, Gudanaviciene
family law, access to justice, litigants in person, legal aid cuts, exceptional case funding, ECF, public law project, Gudanaviciene
Slug : high-court-to-hear-systemic-challenge-to-the-operation-of-the-government-s-legal-aid-exceptional-case-funding-scheme
Meta Title : High Court to hear systemic challenge to the operation of the Government’s legal aid Exceptional Case Funding scheme
Meta Keywords : family law, access to justice, litigants in person, legal aid cuts, exceptional case funding, ECF, public law project, Gudanaviciene
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 9, 2015, 05:25 AM
Article ID : 109531
On Wednesday, 10 June the High Court will begin hearing a judicial review with far reaching implications for the ongoing implementation of the Government’s legal aid cuts. PLP has been instructed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts (2), on behalf of a vulnerable individual, ‘IS’, in a ‘systemic challenge’ to the operation of the Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme, established by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.

The ECF scheme was said by the government to protect the rights of vulnerable and incapacitated individuals who cannot represent themselves and need the services of a lawyer, and who would otherwise be denied access to justice. It is the Claimant’s position that the operation of the scheme, by the Lord Chancellor and the Legal Aid Agency, is unlawful in that it obstructs the very purpose of the legislation – to provide legal aid funding to those who need it most.

This case follows on from the successful challenge in 2014 by IS and others in R (Gudanaviciene and Others) v DLAC and Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 1840 (Admin) (3), which established that the Lord Chancellor’s guidance on ECF was unlawful.

The Lord Chancellor’s guidance is currently being re-drafted, but concerns about the scheme go far beyond its content. PLP will be producing compelling evidence in the form of individual case studies that show that the application process is long drawn out, complex and time consuming. Solicitors are not paid unless the application succeeds, so many of them are unwilling to make applications. Persons who are not represented find the application process inaccessible. Many applications only succeed if solicitors take them to the point of threatening a judicial review. The Claimant’s evidence includes over 70 witness statements, alongside statements from PLP’s own casework team detailing our experiences of helping applicants to access the ECF scheme.

Richard Hermer QC and Chris Buttler of Matrix Chambers are instructed to represent IS at the hearing.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
justice2
Authors
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from