Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening) [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:48 PM
Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order
The mother’s application for a costs funding order against the local authority was dismissed.
Slug : hb-v-a-local-authority-and-another-wardship-costs-funding-order-2017-ewhc-524-fam
Meta Title : HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening) [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 23, 2017, 10:06 AM
Article ID : 113984

(Family Division, MacDonald J, 21 March 2017)

Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order

The mother’s application for a costs funding order against the local authority was dismissed.

The father of the two young children had been in Syria since 2013 and was presumed dead. The mother was alleged to have taken the children to a town in Turkey close to the Syrian border, that she had sought to provide funds to followers of Islamic State, that she held and sympathised with extremist views and that she had placed her children at risk of significant harm.

When the mother attempted to leave the jurisdiction with large sums of money for a second time she was prevented from leaving the country and the children were placed in police protection. Proceedings were initiated under the inherent jurisdiction and the children were made wards of court. The mother was not entitled to non-means, non-merits tested legal aid as a result of the local authority decision to issue wardship rather than care proceedings. The mother, therefore, applied under the inherent jurisdiction for a legal funding order against the local authority.

The mother’s claim was dismissed. The judge held that the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court did not give the court the power to require a local authority to incur expenditure to fund the legal representation of a litigant in wardship proceedings who had been lawfully refused legal aid in accordance with the statutory legal aid scheme put in place by Parliament.


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)

Case No: FD16P000415
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 21/03/2017 

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD




HB
Applicant

-and-

A Local Authority
Respondent

-and-

The Local Government Association
Intervener


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr Charles Hale QC and Mr Christopher Barnes (instructed by Irvine Thanvi Natas Solicitors) for the Applicant
Mr Teertha Gupta QC and Mr Oliver Jones (instructed by the local authority solicitor) for the Respondent
Mr Peter Oldham QC (instructed by the LGA) for the Intervener


Hearing dates: 14, 15 and 16 February 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Approved Judgment


I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.


.............................

HB v A Local Authority and Another [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Costs
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from