Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening) [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:48 PM
Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order
The mother’s application for a costs funding order against the local authority was dismissed.
Slug : hb-v-a-local-authority-and-another-wardship-costs-funding-order-2017-ewhc-524-fam
Meta Title : HB v A Local Authority (Local Government Association intervening) [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 23, 2017, 10:06 AM
Article ID : 113984

(Family Division, MacDonald J, 21 March 2017)

Costs – Wardship – Application for legal funding order

The mother’s application for a costs funding order against the local authority was dismissed.

The father of the two young children had been in Syria since 2013 and was presumed dead. The mother was alleged to have taken the children to a town in Turkey close to the Syrian border, that she had sought to provide funds to followers of Islamic State, that she held and sympathised with extremist views and that she had placed her children at risk of significant harm.

When the mother attempted to leave the jurisdiction with large sums of money for a second time she was prevented from leaving the country and the children were placed in police protection. Proceedings were initiated under the inherent jurisdiction and the children were made wards of court. The mother was not entitled to non-means, non-merits tested legal aid as a result of the local authority decision to issue wardship rather than care proceedings. The mother, therefore, applied under the inherent jurisdiction for a legal funding order against the local authority.

The mother’s claim was dismissed. The judge held that the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court did not give the court the power to require a local authority to incur expenditure to fund the legal representation of a litigant in wardship proceedings who had been lawfully refused legal aid in accordance with the statutory legal aid scheme put in place by Parliament.


Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)

Case No: FD16P000415
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 21/03/2017 

Before:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD




HB
Applicant

-and-

A Local Authority
Respondent

-and-

The Local Government Association
Intervener


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr Charles Hale QC and Mr Christopher Barnes (instructed by Irvine Thanvi Natas Solicitors) for the Applicant
Mr Teertha Gupta QC and Mr Oliver Jones (instructed by the local authority solicitor) for the Respondent
Mr Peter Oldham QC (instructed by the LGA) for the Intervener


Hearing dates: 14, 15 and 16 February 2017


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Approved Judgment


I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.


.............................

HB v A Local Authority and Another [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam).rtf
Categories :
  • Costs
  • Judgments
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from