Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Harm Checks

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Slug : harm-checks
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 14, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85713

The implementation of s 120 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (definition of harm) in January 2005 amended the definition of harm contained in the Children Act 1989. The revised definition applies to all s 8 applications. Revised forms were introduced, allowing parties to tick a box on the form to indicate if they believe the child(ren) have suffered or are at risk of suffering serious harm.

Following discussions between Her Majesty's Court Service (HMCS), the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) and the judiciary, it was agreed that the court would send CAFCASS a copy of every s 8 application on the day of issue, the purpose of which is to alert CAFCASS to any risk of harm to the child(ren). On receipt of the forms, CAFCASS will carry out a range of background checks on the applicant and/or the respondent to the case. Such checks will be internal, with domestic violence units, childrens services or with the police, dependant on the level of harm indicated on the forms.

However, there is nothing on the forms to inform parties that checks may be carried out. Following concerns raised by CAFCASS about this, discussions took place to investigate how to put the information into the public domain. The Court Service is updating the Children Act leaflets, the Notice of Hearing and, temporarily (until the forms are changed), is adding a leaflet to the s 8 application forms to notify parties that copies of forms will be sent to CAFCASS and that background checks may be made.

Meanwhile, people who approach solicitors, mediators and advisers for help should be informed that if they apply to the court for a s 8 order and indicate there is a risk of harm to the child either from themselves or another person, then it is possible that CAFCASS will carry out background safety checks in line with their child protection procedures.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from