Declarations were made that it was in the child’s best interests for artificial ventilation to be withdrawn.
(Family Division, Francis J, 11 April 201)
Declarations were made that it was in the child’s best interests for artificial ventilation to be withdrawn.
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam)
Case No. FD17P00103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Date: Tuesday, 11th April 2017
Before:
MR. JUSTICE FRANCIS
(In Public)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B E T W E E N :
GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL
Applicant
- and -
(1) CONSTANCE YATES
(2) CHRIS GARD
(3) CHARLES GARD
(A Child, By his Guardian Ad Litem)
Respondents
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO.
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
5 New Street Square, London. EC4A 3BF
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MS. D. POWELL QC (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
MS. S. ROPER (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Respondents.
MS. V. BUTLER-COLE (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Guardian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
J U D G M E N T (as approved by the Judge)
Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates and others [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam).rtf
.jpg?sfvrsn=e5a4f948_1)
24 FEB 2021
![Re G (Abduction: Consent/Discretion) [2021] EWCA Civ 139](https://www.familylaw.co.uk/images/article_provider/flr_cover.tmb-moblatest.jpg?sfvrsn=66b9ac90_3)
Leave a commentOrder by
Newest on top Oldest on top