Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates and others [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 19:51 PM
Declarations were made that it was in the child’s best interests for artificial ventilation to be withdrawn.
Slug : great-ormond-street-hospital-v-yates-and-others-2017-ewhc-972-fam
Meta Title : Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates and others [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam)
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 4, 2017, 04:06 AM
Article ID : 114080
(Family Division, Francis J, 11 April 201)

Declarations were made that it was in the child’s best interests for artificial ventilation to be withdrawn.



Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam)
Case No. FD17P00103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION


Royal Courts of Justice


Date: Tuesday, 11th April 2017

Before:

MR. JUSTICE FRANCIS
(In Public)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


B E T W E E N :


GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL
Applicant

- and -

(1) CONSTANCE YATES
(2) CHRIS GARD
(3) CHARLES GARD
(A Child, By his Guardian Ad Litem)
Respondents

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO.
(a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited)
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
5 New Street Square, London. EC4A 3BF
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MS. D. POWELL QC (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
MS. S. ROPER (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Respondents.
MS. V. BUTLER-COLE (of Counsel) appeared on behalf of the Guardian. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


J U D G M E N T (as approved by the Judge)

Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates and others [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam).rtf


Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Medical Treatment
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from