Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Jan 31, 2020, 15:22 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.
Slug :
Meta Title : Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Holman J, 27 November 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure

The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

No. FD09D05089

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
[2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand

London, WC2A 2LL

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Before:
MR JUSTICE HOLMAN

(Case heard in private but this judgment delivered in public)

BETWEEN:

JULIA GODDARD-WATTS
Applicant

- and -

JAMES GODDARD-WATTS
Respondent

__________

JUDGMENT

APPEARANCES

MISS LUCY STONE QC and MR SIMON WEBSTER (instructed by Farrer & Co. LLP) appeared on behalf of the applicant.
MR TIM BISHOP QC and MR RICHARD SEAR (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) appeared on behalf of the respondent.
MR JONATHAN SOUTHGATE QC (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) appeared on behalf of Mr X and FED on the occasion of delivery of this judgment.

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from