Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Jan 31, 2020, 15:22 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.
Slug :
Meta Title : Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Holman J, 27 November 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure

The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.



For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.



This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

No. FD09D05089

[2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice

London, WC2A 2LL

Wednesday, 27 November 2019


(Case heard in private but this judgment delivered in public)



- and -





MISS LUCY STONE QC and MR SIMON WEBSTER (instructed by Farrer & Co. LLP) appeared on behalf of the applicant.
MR TIM BISHOP QC and MR RICHARD SEAR (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) appeared on behalf of the respondent.
MR JONATHAN SOUTHGATE QC (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) appeared on behalf of Mr X and FED on the occasion of delivery of this judgment.

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from