Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Jan 31, 2020, 15:22 PM
Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.
Slug :
Meta Title : Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2020, 00:00 AM
Article ID :

(Family Division, Holman J, 27 November 2019)

Financial remedies – Divorce – Non-disclosure

The Family Division set aside the previous order; there would be a fresh determination of the wife’s claims.

 


 

For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


 

This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.

No. FD09D05089

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
[2019] EWHC 3367 (Fam)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand

London, WC2A 2LL

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Before:
MR JUSTICE HOLMAN

(Case heard in private but this judgment delivered in public)

BETWEEN:

JULIA GODDARD-WATTS
Applicant

- and -

JAMES GODDARD-WATTS
Respondent

__________

JUDGMENT

APPEARANCES

MISS LUCY STONE QC and MR SIMON WEBSTER (instructed by Farrer & Co. LLP) appeared on behalf of the applicant.
MR TIM BISHOP QC and MR RICHARD SEAR (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) appeared on behalf of the respondent.
MR JONATHAN SOUTHGATE QC (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) appeared on behalf of Mr X and FED on the occasion of delivery of this judgment.

Categories :
  • Financial Remedies
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from