Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

FX and MJX v CAFCASS Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

Jun 8, 2020, 10:15 AM
Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction
The Family Court made the declaration sought under the inherent jurisdiction, and dismissed the application under section 57 of the Family Law Act 1986, although another application could be successful at a later time.
Slug :
Meta Title : FX and MJX v CAFCASS Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 7, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Judd J, 18 May 2020)

Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction

The Family Court made the declaration sought under the inherent jurisdiction, and dismissed the application under section 57 of the Family Law Act 1986, although another application could be successful at a later time.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

Case No: FD19P00678
FD20P00028

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 18/05/2020

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE JUDD DBE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

F X and M J X
Applicants

- and -

CAFCASS LEGAL
Advocate to the court

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Ruth Cabeza (instructed by Helen Blackburn of The International Family Law Group LLP) for the Applicants
Christopher Osborne, (Cafcass Legal) as Advocate to the court

Hearing date: 9th March 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

If this Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment will be handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date and time for hand-down will be deemed to be 10am on 18 May 2020. A copy of the judgment in final form as handed down will be automatically sent to counsel shortly afterwards

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE JUDD DBE

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: FX and MJX v Cafcass Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

 

 

 

Categories :
  • Adoption
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from