Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

FX and MJX v CAFCASS Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

Jun 8, 2020, 10:15 AM
Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction
The Family Court made the declaration sought under the inherent jurisdiction, and dismissed the application under section 57 of the Family Law Act 1986, although another application could be successful at a later time.
Slug :
Meta Title : FX and MJX v CAFCASS Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)
Meta Keywords : Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 7, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

(Family Court, Judd J, 18 May 2020)

Adoption – Foreign adoption – Inherent jurisdiction

The Family Court made the declaration sought under the inherent jurisdiction, and dismissed the application under section 57 of the Family Law Act 1986, although another application could be successful at a later time.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

Case No: FD19P00678
FD20P00028

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 18/05/2020

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE JUDD DBE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

F X and M J X
Applicants

- and -

CAFCASS LEGAL
Advocate to the court

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ms Ruth Cabeza (instructed by Helen Blackburn of The International Family Law Group LLP) for the Applicants
Christopher Osborne, (Cafcass Legal) as Advocate to the court

Hearing date: 9th March 2020

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

If this Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment will be handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date and time for hand-down will be deemed to be 10am on 18 May 2020. A copy of the judgment in final form as handed down will be automatically sent to counsel shortly afterwards

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE JUDD DBE

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: FX and MJX v Cafcass Legal [2020] EWHC 1227 (Fam)

 

 

 

Categories :
  • Adoption
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from