Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles

From Pre-nups to Post-nups: Dealing with Marital Property Agreements

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Slug : from-pre-nups-to-post-nups-dealing-with-marital-property-agreements
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 6, 2009, 10:50 AM
Article ID : 85847

Emma Hitchings, School of Law, Bristol University

This article presents preliminary findings from a study of marital property agreements. The research was commissioned as a prelude to the Law Commission's project on marital property agreements in order to provide much needed research from a qualitative perspective into how legal professionals draft such agreements, advise clients and deal with existing agreements. The Law Commission's project commenced on 1 October 2009 and it is anticipated that a report and draft Bill will be published in late 2012. The full research report upon which this article is based will be published on the Law Commission's website at the same time as the Consultation Paper.

Readers of Family Law will be extremely familiar with the recent court machinations on the subject of marital property agreements, which has led Wilson LJ to suggest that there is a 'lack of clarity in the treatment of pre-nuptial contracts under our present law' (Radmacher v Granatino [2008] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] 2 FLR (forthcoming) at para [128], hereafter referred to as Radmacher. For a detailed commentary, see J Miles, 'Radmacher v Granatino: Upping the ante-nuptial agreement' [2009] 21(4) CFLQ (forthcoming)). Although pre-marital and pre-registration property agreements made between spouses and civil partners (or those contemplating marriage or civil partnership) are not currently enforceable in the event of the spouses' divorce or the dissolution of the civil partnership, agreements are a material consideration under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) particularly in light of the Court of Appeal's decision in Radmacher. This article will highlight some of the main findings from the research study, particularly in relation to practitioners' experiences of agreements and procedural and substantive issues arising from advising clients and drafting agreements. Any comments made during the course of this article are the author's own and do not reflect Law Commission policy.

To read the rest of this article, see November [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from