Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Forced Marriage Legislation

Sep 29, 2018, 17:05 PM
Title : Forced Marriage Legislation
Slug : forced-marriage-legislation
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 26, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85729

In September 2005 the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Home Office published a consultation document entitled 'Forced Marriage: a Wrong not a Right' (see [2005] Fam Law 919). It stated that there was currently no specific criminal offence of forcing someone to marry within England, but the law did not provide protection from the crimes that could be committed when forcing someone into a marriage. The FCO Forced Marriage Unit received 157 responses to the consultation, from across England and Wales as well as from Scotland, and in May 2006 published a summary of those responses. Thirty-seven per cent of respondents felt that the Government should not create a specific offence of forcing someone into marriage. Seventy four per cent of police respondents and all Crown Prosecution Service and Probation Service respondents felt that the existing legislation was sufficient to tackle the issue.Thirty-four per cent of respondents felt that the Government should create a specific criminal offence of forced marriage. Childrens and young peoples services made up the majority of this group.

The Forced Marriage Unit will now discuss the results of the consultation with ministers from both the Home Office and the FCO. They will take a decision on whether or not to create a specific criminal offence of forcing someone into marriage. Once this decision has been made, the Forced Marriage Unit will publish an action plan of how to move forward with tackling the issue of forced marriage. This will include how the non-legislative measures suggested by respondents to this consultation could be used. The Forced Marriage Unit hopes to publish this action plan by the autumn of 2006. See August [2006] Fam Law for the full news article.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from